<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lexitechnia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lexitechnia.frath.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net</link>
	<description>Harmless drudgery, translation, and language invention.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 04:58:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Âdlantki word of the moment. by Muke</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/03/adlantki-word-of-the-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7075</link>
		<dc:creator>Muke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 04:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1026#comment-7075</guid>
		<description>The plural&#039;s just &lt;em&gt;prušnis&lt;/em&gt; — nothin&#039; fancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plural&#8217;s just <em>prušnis</em> — nothin&#8217; fancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Âdlantki word of the moment. by Esploranto</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/03/adlantki-word-of-the-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-7050</link>
		<dc:creator>Esploranto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1026#comment-7050</guid>
		<description>Very nice word, can&#039;t say exactly why, but I really like how this word turned out, prušni seems a very interesting development of *proH₂-ǵnH₁-o-, what would its plural be?

I hope we can see more words like this one, very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice word, can&#8217;t say exactly why, but I really like how this word turned out, prušni seems a very interesting development of *proH₂-ǵnH₁-o-, what would its plural be?</p>
<p>I hope we can see more words like this one, very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adjectives associating with &#8216;capillus&#8217; in classical Latin. by Muke</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/04/adjectives-associating-with-capillus-in-classical-latin/comment-page-1/#comment-6821</link>
		<dc:creator>Muke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 23:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1098#comment-6821</guid>
		<description>Indeed! 

Suetonius does comes somewhat after the date range I meant to cover in this post, though (which I seem to have neglected to specify, but was 1st c. BC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! </p>
<p>Suetonius does comes somewhat after the date range I meant to cover in this post, though (which I seem to have neglected to specify, but was 1st c. BC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adjectives associating with &#8216;capillus&#8217; in classical Latin. by Jacob Love</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/04/adjectives-associating-with-capillus-in-classical-latin/comment-page-1/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1098#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>Suetonius  (Nero, section  51) describes Nero as &quot;subflavo capillo.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suetonius  (Nero, section  51) describes Nero as &#8220;subflavo capillo.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cases in Drake. by Lexitechnia &#187; Nother &#187; Some Drake roots.</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/03/cases-in-drake/comment-page-1/#comment-5689</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexitechnia &#187; Nother &#187; Some Drake roots.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 22:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1023#comment-5689</guid>
		<description>[...] *bǐn- &gt; PD *mən- &gt; D mon- &#8220;to build&#8221; — miine &#8220;house&#8221; from the last Drake post is also from this root; compare Hebrew בנה bana [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *bǐn- &gt; PD *mən- &gt; D mon- &#8220;to build&#8221; — miine &#8220;house&#8221; from the last Drake post is also from this root; compare Hebrew בנה bana [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scyllas in Ovid. by Lexitechnia &#187; Latin &#187; Adjectives associating with &#8216;capillus&#8217; in classical Latin.</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2011/03/scyllas-in-ovid/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexitechnia &#187; Latin &#187; Adjectives associating with &#8216;capillus&#8217; in classical Latin.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=1014#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>[...] — purple, once in Ovid, once in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] — purple, once in Ovid, once in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#039;Abhinc&#039; in Horace. by Lexitechnia &#187; Piataia &#187; On Ibran orthography (a start)</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2008/06/abhinc-in-horace/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexitechnia &#187; Piataia &#187; On Ibran orthography (a start)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frath.net/wordpress/?p=99#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>[...] among the perfect and the ancient&#8217; as opposed to &#8216;the cheap and the modern&#8217;, as I have a habit of mentioning Horace said?   I mean, you may think a thousand years is a long time, but that&#8217;s just peanuts compared [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] among the perfect and the ancient&#8217; as opposed to &#8216;the cheap and the modern&#8217;, as I have a habit of mentioning Horace said?   I mean, you may think a thousand years is a long time, but that&#8217;s just peanuts compared [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Henaudute sentence of the moment. by Lexitechnia &#187; Arda &#187; Henaudute sentence of the moment.</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2010/07/henaudute-sentence-of-the-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-3722</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexitechnia &#187; Arda &#187; Henaudute sentence of the moment.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=959#comment-3722</guid>
		<description>[...]  I don&#8217;t know what it is about Henaudute that lets me get so much created in it; I mentioned last time I touched this text that it was the longest bit of Henaudute I have—I think actually it&#8217;s the longest I have in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I don&#8217;t know what it is about Henaudute that lets me get so much created in it; I mentioned last time I touched this text that it was the longest bit of Henaudute I have—I think actually it&#8217;s the longest I have in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pliny on the formation of selenite. by Muke</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2009/11/pliny-on-the-formation-of-selenite/comment-page-1/#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator>Muke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=855#comment-3609</guid>
		<description>Pliny does assume quartz is formed this way in this passage; I haven&#039;t seen if he asserts it explicitly elsewhere. 

The word &#039;selenite&#039; may be ambiguous in some authors, but the name Pliny uses in this section is &#039;lapis specularis&#039;, which I think is unambiguously the gypsum crystal.   He says the original and highest-quality source of it was Segóbriga, and the mines there were gypsum mines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pliny does assume quartz is formed this way in this passage; I haven&#8217;t seen if he asserts it explicitly elsewhere. </p>
<p>The word &#8216;selenite&#8217; may be ambiguous in some authors, but the name Pliny uses in this section is &#8216;lapis specularis&#8217;, which I think is unambiguously the gypsum crystal.   He says the original and highest-quality source of it was Segóbriga, and the mines there were gypsum mines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pliny on the formation of selenite. by Alex</title>
		<link>http://lexitechnia.frath.net/2009/11/pliny-on-the-formation-of-selenite/comment-page-1/#comment-3606</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexitechnia.frath.net/?p=855#comment-3606</guid>
		<description>I read elsewhere (I forget where; probably on Plinipedia :) ) that Pliny  regarded quartz as a form of ice that had become &quot;permanent&quot; due to being frozen for a long time. This had been justified by the observation that quartz had been found on glaciers but not on volcanoes.

It&#039;s my understanding that there&#039;s much confusion as to the identity of &quot;selenite&quot; - as the name has been used for either moonstone or for the crystalline form of Gypsum, two completely different minerals.  I&#039;m currently attempting to unravel this one.  Can of worms.


http://www.gemstoneslist.com/moonstone.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read elsewhere (I forget where; probably on Plinipedia :) ) that Pliny  regarded quartz as a form of ice that had become &#8220;permanent&#8221; due to being frozen for a long time. This had been justified by the observation that quartz had been found on glaciers but not on volcanoes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my understanding that there&#8217;s much confusion as to the identity of &#8220;selenite&#8221; &#8211; as the name has been used for either moonstone or for the crystalline form of Gypsum, two completely different minerals.  I&#8217;m currently attempting to unravel this one.  Can of worms.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gemstoneslist.com/moonstone.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gemstoneslist.com/moonstone.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

